Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Soccer Players Showering

MARTYRS EE


"The ground of the vast plateau karst hides a world of darkness and dark abyss vertical burrows that are lost in the deep silence of the land, vast caverns, winding tunnels traversed by streams of screaming, covered in salt crystals enchanted, wild caves that imagination of the vulgar crowd of scary legends. "R. Battle

The term "foiba" is a dialect corruption of the Latin "fovea", meaning "pit"; le foibe, infatti, sono voragini rocciose, a forma di imbuto rovesciato, create dall’erosione di corsi d’acqua; possono raggiungere i 200 metri di profondità”
In Istria sono state registrate più di 1.700 foibe. (Nella foto sopra una foiba istriana).

Le foibe furono utilizzate in diverse occasioni e, in particolare, subito dopo la fine della seconda guerra mondiale per infoibare ("spingere nella foiba") migliaia di italiani, antifascisti e fascisti, colpevoli di opporsi all’espansionismo comunista slavo propugnato da Josip Broz meglio conosciuto come Maresciallo Tito.
A riguardo è interessante riportare quanto affermato da Kardelj (vice di Tito) il quale poté affermare che "We were asked to leave the Italians by all means and it was done." Nobody knows how many have been the infoibati: some estimates speak of Unfortunate 10-15000.

victims of Tito were conducted, after atrocious tortures, near the foiba, here's jailers, do not pay already inflicted ill-treatment, blocked the wrists and feet with wire to each person with the help of pliers, and then bound to each other all through the wire. The butchers, in most cases, they fired the first victim of the group tumbled into ruin in foiba pushing themselves to others.

Over the years, these martyrs were vilified and forgotten. Consider that, looking through the "Vocabulary of the Italian language" published by Treccani, you run into a lot of evasive definition of foiba: "In geology, physics, type of sinkhole, in particular., In Istria, a large closed basin (due to sinkholes fused together) on the bottom of a sinkhole opens.

Where is the truth? On the tragic issue sinkholes are therefore still the "veiled lady", not only on his skills, but also on its veracity. And 'though useful to ask how never the whole story has remained a dark chapter, a chapter removed for so long. Those who have had the interest to leave it in the dark?

In the first place - is the response of historians - the interest is the Anglo-Americans. When it wears out in 1948 the break between Tito and Moscow and the West looks at Marshall as a possible valuable ally against the USSR, is dropped any idea of \u200b\u200bdeepening the events of 1945: "Belgrade's explanation about the political nature of the deletions and the general innocence of the dead, becomes a kind of official version accepted by Western diplomats not to the point. "

Second "remove" is the Italian Government by De Gasperi who do not like at all to turn the spotlight on humiliating terms acceptable to the Free Territory of Trieste (which will remain in the hands until November 26, 1954): "the silence historical foibe becomes functional on the silence on the peace treaty and the decrease of national sovereignty. "

Finally, the interest is also silencing of the PCI, not at all taken back on an issue that highlights the contradictions between the new location the national party, and the internationalist ties with Moscow.

Foibe. It 's the case ... Not to forget to talk about it!
.
VENETIAN FLAME

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

The Morning After Pill Aftereffects

WELL ... BE ...


EE Well ... well ... would they!
for 17 years die are long, or are short ...
17 years for not having a moment of peace, or have a peace different from the other sense or no sense ...
17 years to hear about you and about you can not have been flying heavy or light ...
We ask ourselves too many things in this world more and more absurd, but every time there is a possible answer seems as if we care at all of it, the answer ... there seems to interest more demand, even if it is even useless ...
Or, if we put it in economic terms we are interested in supply and demand ...
We declare ourselves liberal, liberal ... We would like to be free, libertines ...
But ever breached the freedom of others, not accepting that our freedom ends where that of our neighbor!
Freedom ... People of Freedom that we are ... that of live and let live? I think so ...
And the loss of live and let live, is not as euphemism for freedom? Apparently not ...
Meanwhile, journalists and profit from speculating on the life and death, the media audience are life and death, la politica si interessa di vita e di morte, argomento sul quale potrebbe lasciar pure decidere ai plebei.
La Chiesa non fa altro che fare quello che ha sempre fatto... intromettersi...
La giusta mediazione tra positivo e negativo?
Forse è... Decidi... e lascia decidere...
Intanto E.E. Well...be!
FIAMMA VENETA

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Whole Sale Earths Best

sleep peacefully ... U.S. NOI I BUONI!


Chiudo le pagine del quotidiano e per un attimo I am assailed by a doubt: who are the good guys?
The cold war comes to accounting for more than a thousand dead in the Gaza Strip: civilians, militiamen, but in the end because it is difficult to distinguish against troops, planes, helicopters and Israeli tanks, has not beaten a regular army but who, in a people afflicted by the hardships of the embargo, had the strength to do it, then finding himself more involved than digging through the rubble looking for victims. Yet
was violating the truce with Hamas to launch rockets from Gaza into Israeli towns, which is why the reaction of Jerusalem must be justified, and certainly it is not to blame if, in an attempt to annihilate the fundamentalists, it affects civilians, since the first mix between the houses and the streets of Gaza with the innocent citizens: we know that the tragedy of every conflict lies in the suffering that the people who are suffering, wars took their respective government representatives, in most cases they would rather avoid. In this case, however, the question returns: what if civil and fundamentalists were the same people, or still living under the same roof for real blood ties? Then the choice of breaking the truce would be crazy, inexplicable form of collective self-harm that is dictated by Islamic fundamentalism that fuels terrorist organizations that are shaking the world in the name of jihad.
But there is another justification for such a chance: despair.
Yes we are talking about a people, the Palestinians, more and more exhausted by the lack of the most basic means of survival imposed by the embargo.
not forget the images that only a few months ago, showed us the people to break down the high walls of the wall being built around this territory, in search of basic necessities, the same people who today look for a way escape by digging tunnels into Egypt, the same people who, in all likelihood, then, is willing to break a truce against an enemy stronger and more influential, not because of ideology, but of survival: after all who would not rather die fighting for their right to exist, when the alternative was to die of hunger, thirst or cold?
probably also because of such considerations, now Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary-current, guilty of having turned back after a feeble attempt to intervene, said that the Israeli reaction was "excessive", but it is then necessary to ask why is not stopped, or at least mitigated, if it has also aroused the indignation of the United Nations.
has not raised a chorus of voices a chiedere il “cessate il fuoco” se non da qualche manifestazione di piazza: la maggioranza del mondo politico sembra essere rimasta a guardare, e anzi numerosi leader occidentali, così come il più dei politici italiani, sono arrivati a propagandare, attraverso televisioni e giornali, il dovere di sostenere Israele in questa sua battaglia per il diritto di esistere.
Eppure sembrerebbe che fosse la sopravvivenza dei palestinesi ad essere messa maggiormente a repentaglio, stando alle notizie che giungono fino a noi, confidando sempre che non vengano prima opportunamente “filtrate” per ridimensionare la portata degli attacchi inflitti da Israele.
Sarà pure il solito ritornello, ma considerato what is happening and given the reaction of the world, no one may ask, once again, how far the tentacles reach of those lobbying for economic and political power which refer to Jerusalem?
And how likely does not reflect on the influence they may have in making decisions about international politics?
should be considered then a final point, some already mentioned earlier: the partnership between the U.S. and Israel is unbreakable, the Western world, including Italy, do not seem to find the courage to paddle, if necessary, against combination of Washington-Jerusalem, the UN, the most important international organizations, seems to suffer from the same disease, all statements in this part (as "Verba Volant").
said that it is easier to understand how easily the strength of the front "pro-Israel", has been able to guarantee Lead Time carte blanche in the transaction.
breaking news now says that Hamas has agreed to a truce if it is true that usually gives the bad then we won, we're the good ... and then we can sleep peacefully.

PM81

Watch Movie Online Espanol

SPECCHIETTI PER LE ALLODOLE...


But the league wants it Federalism?
O for the league the term federalism is a smokescreen ...
One way to say to get votes?
And what the league wants to federalism? But not only the league, what we talk about federalism?
publish in this regard, an article by our new contributor:
"I was imagining a scene more or less evangelical.
A diverse crowd, wildly diverse, fragmented in a random order ... 'infamous horde immersed in a wave of nauseating busy swearing in the activity that most suits her: Order!
And there, front, softly silent awaiting trial, you ... adultery federalism!
Adulteress, of course.
Courted by most, but incapable of a stable relationship. - Continuity with the image.
Under "who has never adulterated with it, having always respected and honored, let him cast the first stone", I would expect to see a flying rock thrown from an unusual character named League, claiming sinless and stably married to it.
But instead, nothing ... not even a pebble.
And then the disappointment of the crowd ... bye
see, there's a worm in my mind, that haunts me now for a bit 'of time, I was able to isolate and identify, and it is this: is there anyone who really wants'm blessed federalism??
For my efforts, I find no yes!
But maybe I'm thinkin 'a bit' of confusion: political federalism, administrative and fiscal devolution. ... Mah
Then I tried to see and analyze it from the perspective of those who at present is in the forefront, and dealing with everyday ripples of the government-citizen relationship, is in the trenches at the front: the common.
It is now known to most that federalism is that "political doctrine array Enlightenment (eighteenth century) that rejects the separation between states and proposed federation" (Encicl. "The Garzantine).
In Italy, federalism as early as 1945 to have been inspired by some active autonomist movements, and with more determination, since the '80s, the Northern League. At its most masterful, or political-institutional federalism transfuses its peculiarities in the so-called administrative federalism operational (defined as a transfer to the regions and local government functions and financial resources of the central government) and federalism (understood as a principle officer of the tax system under which local governments decide, at least in part, the measure of tax burden in its territory and receive the proceeds).
The term decentralization (devolution), indeed, adopted dalla Gran Bretagna nei confronti della Scozia, si indica il trasferimento di poteri dallo stato centrale alle autorità locali, al fine di accrescerne l'autonomia decisionale (nel 2001, il governo Berlusconi aveva istituito il Ministero senza portafoglio "per le riforme istituzionali e la devoluzione" assegnandolo a Bossi).
A qualunque di questi concetti io faccia riferimento, fatico a scorgere, nel nostro paese, risvolti operativi ed applicativi di una qualsivoglia forma di decentramento.
Il dubbio che sempre più mi assale, ma che al contempo lascia sempre più spazio ad una fastidiosa certezza, è che, in realtà, il federalismo nessuno lo vuole, nemmeno la Lega.
Perché? Boh!
Forse per paura di a loss of power and authority from the state.
It 's true that in 2001, with the Constitutional Law 3, which led to a substantial revision of Title V of the Constitution, the work of structuring of federalism has been a milestone, but it is equally true that the problems are many applications still open and that, to be honest, a few steps back has been done.
Article. 114 of the Constitution, as reformulated by L. Est. 3 / 2001, defines the substance of the Italy of the joint: "The Republic is composed of the Municipalities, Provinces, Metropolitan Cities, Regions and the State. Municipalities, provinces, metropolitan cities and regions are autonomous entities [...] ".
The list of what the Republic is just part of the Municipalities.
And this is no accident.
E 'public administration closer to the citizen.
Without going into technical and academic discourses in and doctrine on how this reform has affected the relationship between the sources of law, and the relationship between the state and regional legislative power, it can be argued that the legislature has the constitutional right laid the groundwork for the political-institutional federalism (art. 114 Cost . above), for administrative federalism (Article 118 of the Constitution
"Administrative functions are attributed to the municipalities [...]"), and the financial and fiscal federalism (Article 119 of the Constitution "Municipalities, provinces, metropolitan cities and regions shall have independent financial revenue and expenditure).
But these solid bases (bases are constitutional!) Are not followed equally strong federal policy.
fact. Often
steps have been taken in the opposite direction. Let us see what.
municipal revenues are divided into two broad categories, those ones and their derivatives. Those depend on their ability to raise resources (or taxation: ICI, public spaces occupation tax, imposed on advertising and on public billboards, or the provision of services to individual applications: gyms, sports facilities ...), those derived stem (exactly) paid by transfers from central government. The more own revenue, a percentage of total revenue, the greater the financial autonomy of the Commune. Well. Until 2007, every town of Italy in 8100, could count on sharing income tax of a certain size, or a portion IRPEF that the state collects the tax base of the municipality, he returned to the municipal coffers. This portion, up to 2006 was approximately 7%, from about 2007 to 0.7%. This lesser amount was offset by a greater transfer state representative. Not bad, I say, because the municipal budget does not change anything. Not bad, sure, except that the partnership income tax "snap" revenue municipalities the ability to produce income of the citizens of that town, while transfers / fees, any link between the wealth produced in a certain town, and the town itself is not. With the partnership, a portion of taxes levied in a given territory, return to that territory, the transfer state representative, no! Reduce the cost will outweigh with transfers / fees, therefore controlled by the central government, federalism is a choice? But we
ICI. One of the first things done by the present government was to abolish the ICI on the first house. Very good. But you know the continuation of the story? This was only the first time. The second is not. The revenue forgone ICI certificate T his fair by each municipality, is offset by increased transfers / fees. Well
. Abolish the ICI (local tax), offset them with transfers / fees (central government) is a federalist choice? Probably I'll be accusing anyone of not wanting to reduce the tax burden. But this reflects
someone: for the Town Hall coffers does not change almost anything: instead of cash in respect of ICI, the municipality collects as a transfer. The money that was paid as a transfer resulting from taxation of the entire national territory. This means that the money that the first citizens of the City of Mira paid as ICI, now do not pay them more, as the same amount is paid by all Italian citizens, but equally, the citizens of Citadel, will pay a lower tax ICI citizens of all other municipalities in Italy ... any reference to the territory is lost!
We also think about the constraints that the state requires each municipality, for the enforcement of the Stability Pact, on spending (a couple of years ago, also on individual items of expenditure). Where is the budgetary autonomy? The Prodi government had foreseen, as a sanction for municipalities that did not respect the stability pact, the increase in the municipal income tax for the citizens of that municipality. Although the questionable principle that the consequences of mismanagement of the local administrators were allowed to fall on the citizens, was the federalist principle of responsibility to the directors in the eyes of its citizens.
The current government changed the system of sanctions, imposed strict controls and cost constraints which effectively cancel out the financial autonomy of the town ... That's funny ... I do not say it was more federalist than the current Prodi government, but if At least, doubt creeps. I'm
federalism is courted by several political parties, but it seems that nobody is able to establish a stable and enduring. We will see with the new code of local
League ... what will happen if you're there, knock once! "
PRINCE